Monday 16 September 2013

Brian Pead arrested by Armed Police

Dear Recipient,

I am a friend of Brian's and I'd like to update you about his circumstances.

He has left his flat in Southend and moved to a secret location in Norfolk where he is being looked after by friends who have seen through the miscarriages of justice that he has been involved in after uncovering child abuse in Lambeth and police corruption.

On 16 July 2013 he appeared at the High Court where Lambeth Council attempted to obtain a PERMANENT gagging order on him to prevent him writing or speaking about his time at Lambeth for the rest of his life! The Order was, naturally, unsuccessful.

His 10th book FROM HILLSBOROUGH TO LAMBETH is still currently the subject of a gagging order.

His website www.allaroundjustice.com has been unlawfully removed by the authorities in yet another example of a cover-up.

The website http://lambethchildabuseandcoverup.com (hosted in Slovakia through a friend of Brian's) was also unlawfully removed by the authorities, despite the website being outside of the jurisdiction of England & Wales.

Brian's unlawful trial at Southwark in December 2009 is the subject of a new book FRAMED! and is available now.

On 1 August 2013, Brian was unlawfully arrested by ARMED POLICE at a friend's farm. He was handcuffed too tightly and I took pictures of the severe damage to his wrists. Despite informing the police that he had two broken ribs (still haling slowly), they continued to force his hands and arms behind his back, causing great pain and committing common assault.

He was dragged from his cell at approx. 4.30AM and forced to answer a charge of criminal damage to a car. (He had not of course perpetrated any such damage ... I am a witness to this fact.)

Whilst under police interview, other officers went to the farm where he was staying and unlawfully removed his AppleMac computer and legal papers. The computer was not placed in an evidence bag and there is no chain of custody for it. The police had no Search Warrant to enter the property. It appears that the whole reason the police wanted to arrest Brian on 1 August 2013 at my farm was to unlawfully seize his computer to see what information he had on there about their illegal activities. The information, of course, is held in secret locations around the UK and Europe. This is the second time the police have unlawfully seized a computer related to Brian.

On 13 September 2013, Brian attended King's Lynn Magistrates' Court for directions in the criminal damage case. Whilst in Court, the Crown Prosecution Service then charged him with THREATENING BEHAVIOUR on 1 August 2013 (no such behaviour was displayed by Brian on that or any other day and I am, again, a witness), so he walked into Court with ONE charge and left with TWO charges!

Most people who know the TRUE story about Brian (as opposed to the disinformation spread by the police and judiciary) will know that he has been the target of severe persecution by the state since he uncovered child abuse in Lambeth and on a social networking website and that the authorities try to spread rumours that he is a sex offender. He is not, of course, but it's one way in which the police try to turn people against their target.

We will be writing to you again shortly and asking you to write to your MP about this severe persecution of an innocent man. We believe that it is EVERYBODY'S responsibility to get the legal system and police force we deserve rather than the corrupt system which operates currently. Edmund Burke said: "All that is necessary for Evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing".

Brian's MP in Southend (James Duddridge for the record) wrote to him and said, "Do not correspond with me again" after Brian sent him incontrovertible evidence of police corruption. UNITED WE STAND ... divided, they win.

Which would you prefer?

Kind regards
Richard Fulcher
01485 601 516




Thursday 5 September 2013

GUNFIGHT AT RAMBLEWOOD FARM

oN tHURSDAY 1st August 2013, armed police showed up at Rambledwood Farm in darkest, deepest Norfolk to arrest campaigner and respected author, Brian Pead.

His alleged crime this time? Criminal Damage! They're hasving a laugh! The bloke is known to like to BUILD or CREATE things, not destory them!

The bloke's a legend. Even Dave Courtney said so when they shared a cell in Belmarsh Prison. (For those who don't know, Dave Courtney is the bloke who arranged the Krays' funeral, has starred in films and known to be a real "geezer".) Brian and Dave got on a like a house on fire, and since they both hate the authorities, they had a lot in common.

Anyway, Brian was arrested on 1 August and taken to the Police Investigation Centre in Saddlebow, near King's lynn, Norfolk.

What a sight for sore eyes that is, apparently.

Anyway, they drag Brian out of his bed at 4.30am and show him photographs of the criminal damage he's suposed to have done. What a load of idiots! The series of photos proved NOTHING!

Brian gave a full no comment interview. Then the boys in blue ARRESTED HIM WHILE HE WAS ALREADY UNDER ARREST (they get off on a power trip, I'm sure of it - imagine being married to a bloody copper (no thanks!) -

His alleged crime? They claim he is a sex offender and they claim he breached an order to tell them of his address!

Muppets (to use a Courtney-ism)!

Then they claimed he "impeded a police officer in the execution of his duty" by giving a false name!

YOU HAVE TO LAUGH AT THE EXTRME LENGTHS THEY WILL GO TO TO BLACKEN HIS NAME AND THAT MUPPET DAUGHTER OF HIS BELIEVES THEM!

Oh, wait a minute! She's married to a bloke who mends cars for the ... wait for it .... MET POLICE!

Oh, Brian's not been fitted up then by any chance?

And a girl called JENNY START from Sidcup (apparently a bit of a rapper - or some similar word) once called brian and said to him "I wouldn't let you in a million miles of kids!"

What does she know? Not a lot ... and they tell me she went to a GRAMMAR SCHool in Sidcup! Don't they teach them anything these days.

JENNYSTART is allegedly a friend of SORREL PEAD, now SORREL BIRCH.

What planet do they live on, cuase it's not planet reality!

Anyways, King's Lynn Magistrates Court on 13 September 2013. Be there to witness the ongoing farce!

KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK BRIAN PEAD - EXPOSE THE BASTARDS!

CAROLINE ADDY SEEKS PERMANENT GAGGING ORDER ON BRIAN PEAD

I've been following the case of Brian Pead very closely.

This ALLEGED sex offender (never a victim in his case!) went to the High Court in the Strand. I was in the public gallery watching the farce of all farces!

With NO witnesses, NO victim, NO evidence ... he was sent to Pentonville Prison for two weeks. I spoke with him before the case and he said it's gonna be in his next book. I can't wait, because I love his true life crime books.

Then when he came out, Lambeth Council who unlawfully sacked him, tried to bill him for £24,000 for sending him to prison! They simply shift the blame and take the piss! I heard on the grapevine that Lord Denning helped Brian out!

Then Brian was back at the High Court on 16 July 2013. Guess what? CAROLINE ADDY, supposedly a human rights lawyer, ASKED FOR A PERMENENT GAGGING ORDER on Brian ... yet in the same breath she's claiming that Brian and Michael's book FROM HILLSBOROUGH TO LAMBETH was "an attempt to re-write history". If it was such a crap book, why would they ban that PLUS the <www.allaroundjustice>website and the <http://lambethchildabuseandcoverup.com> websites?

BRIAN PEAD IS A DANGER.... NOT to children, but to THE SO-CALLED AUTHORITIES.

So, they've sent Brian to jail TWICE for no reason ... the first time was the alleged WITNESS INTIMIDATION of his grand-daughter EMILY BIRCH who has never been a witness in a trial of any sort!

In Belmarsh Prison, he shared a cell with DAVE COURTNEY - the celebrity gangster. The two men shared a passion to speak out against injustice. The corrupt judges who jailed Brian will be outed in his next book, as well as the bent barristers he's met since they decided he was a danger to kids at the age of 55 after a quarter of a century in teaching with no problems. And THEY only decided he was a danger to kids AFTER he exposed child abuse and corruption in Lambeth on a MASSIVE scale! As for the police corruption he uncovered ... you would be here a lifetime if I shared all THAT with you. All I will say, is look at the HILLSBOROUGH DISASTER website to read about police corruption on AN INDUSTRIAL SCALE. Bastards!

Many people email me and ask baout Brian's daughter. Sorrel Pead, now Sorrel Birch. I've done some research and Geoffrey Bacon (a friend of Brian's who I've also met) told me she was a "spoilt child who could'nt see the truth if it slapped her round the face!"

I guess that sums it all up! Obviously not the kinda daughter a guy can rely on. Her loss!






Sunday 24 March 2013

Threat to ALL Whisleblowers

THREAT TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH and ALL WHISTLEBLOWERS
Time: March 27, 2013from 10am to 4:30pm
Location: ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE, THE STRAND, LONDON
Street: THE STRAND
City/Town: LONDON
Website or Map: http://lambethchildabuseandcoverup.com
Phone: 0756 400 2493
Event Type: high,court,action,threatening,free,speech
Brian is being threatened with Contempt of Court for allegedly refusing to comply with a Court Order banning the sale of his book FROM HILLSBOROUGH TO LAMBETH which exposes child abuse, racism and corruption within Lambeth Council, where he was a Head Teacher.
Please help fill the Public Gallery. If you are unable to make the whole session, come for part of it. Please call the above number for the precise time. Thank you.
Brian Pead Persecuted because he exposed child abuse

Thursday 21 March 2013

Banned book going viral !

BANNED BOOK VIDEO CRASHES THROUGH THE 1,000 UNIQUE VIEWS BARRIER!


Thursday 21 March 2013

The video by EddytheCat7 Productions about the book from Hillsborough to Lambeth (corruption and cover-up of child abuse and racism in Lambeth Council) has just achieved 1,000 unique views on YouTube.

The 9-minute video is now being viewed on both sides of the Atlantic, where Free Speech is a constitutionally-guarded right, and various countries in Europe.

The video highlights the TWO “Gagging Orders” issued against the book on 30 January 2013 at the Royal Courts of Justice by Judge Tugendhat (Court 14).

It also tells the compelling story of why Lambeth Council wrongfully dismissed a successful Head teacher, Brian Pead, and reinstated an unqualified South African female supply teacher (who had not been CRB checked by Lambeth HR) whom Pead had dismissed for grooming female pupils and racism towards black male pupils.

We contacted Brian Pead who said,

"...I am delighted that the video has come to the attention of a thousand people, but this is not about me. Nor is it about the book. This issue is about Justice. It is about exposing corruption and wrongdoing. It is about the 'little person' standing up to the full panoply of what the State can throw at an innocent person it deems to be a threat.

Some people are writing to me and calling me a 'hero'. I am not a hero. I am just doing what any person, I believe, would do in my situation when you have had your reputation impugned unfairly, when you have lost contact with your beloved grand-children and when the State has bullied you for 6 years.

MY heroes are people like the Pankhurst sisters who went to jail for their basic human rights, Nelson Mandela who was also unlawfully and wrongfully imprisoned by a corrupt and racist Government, Christine Collins who was not only unlawfully imprisoned but declared 'mad' by a corrupt Los Angeles Police Chief and also Doreen Lawrence who has not only received the book, but who has fought tirelessly to expose corruption. These are MY heroes and heroines.

I wish to thank all the people who are watching the video and sharing it in the name of Justice. I wish to thank co-author Michael Bird. I also wish to thank the team at EddytheCat7 Productions..."

In the interests of Free Speech, Justice and Exposing Corruption, please SHARE THIS VIDEO and help to make it go viral.

© LambethChildAbuseAndCoverUp.com 2013 All Rights Reserved

Tuesday 19 March 2013

UK Police compared with the Stasi

UK police likened to the Stasi in its treatment of Brian Pead

On the Justice Denied blog, this comment was posted today:

news19 March 2013 08:56
[...] The targeting by the Police of this Grandfather is reminiscent of the Stasi.
And sadder still this is not an isolated case the Police, the Prosecution service and the Judiciary particularly target decent people who want to expose child abuse! Why is that? There can be only one answer !

Will keep you updated on Brian Pead a brave and good man.

By an odd quirk of fate, Brian Pead was in Berlin at the time of the fall of the Berlin Wall.

The Stasi
"...The Stasi perfected the technique of psychological harassment of perceived enemies known as Zersetzung – a term borrowed from chemistry which literally means "corrosion" or "undermining".

By the 1970s, the Stasi had decided that methods of overt persecution which had been employed up to that time, such as arrest and torture, were too crude and obvious. It was realised that psychological harassment was far less likely to be recognised for what it was, so its victims, and their supporters, were less likely to be provoked into active resistance, given that they would often not be aware of the source of their problems, or even its exact nature. Zersetzung was designed to side-track and "switch off" perceived enemies so that they would lose the will to continue any "inappropriate" activities.

Tactics employed under Zersetzung generally involved the disruption of the victim’s private or family life. This often included breaking into homes and messing with the contents – moving furniture, altering the timing of an alarm, removing pictures from walls or replacing one variety of tea with another. Other practices included smear campaigns, denunciation, provocation, psychological warfare, psychological subversion, wiretapping, bugging, mysterious phone calls or unnecessary deliveries, even including sending a vibrator to a target's wife. Usually victims had no idea the Stasi were responsible. Many thought they were losing their minds, and mental breakdowns and suicide could result.

One great advantage of the harassment perpetrated under Zersetzung was that its subtle nature meant that it was able to be denied. That was important given that the German Democratic Republic was trying to improve its international standing during the 1970s and 80s..."
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stasi
© Wikipedia  All Rights Reserved

http://www.stasimuseum.de/en/engeschichte.htm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/learningzone/clips/communism-in-east-germany/10107.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stasi

© LambethChildAbuseAndCoverUp.com 2013 All Rights Reserved

Monday 18 March 2013

Brian Pead arrested - AGAIN!

Unlawful arrest of Brian Pead
Friday, 15 March 2013.
Southend Police Station, Essex
Time: 20:35
Arresting Officer: APS Harper [71035]
Reason for Arrest: Failing to Provide Essex Police with Contact Details


On his dead brother’s 62nd birthday, Brian Pead was arrested [15th March]. He spent the night in the cells on his late father’s birthday [16th March], so his detention came at a critical period on Brian’s calendar and spanned the birthdays of two important people in his life.

At 8pm, Brian attended Southend Police Station with Michael Bird, co-author of from Hillsborough to Lambeth, a book exposing child abuse, racism and corruption at Lambeth Council.

They had gone to report trespass, harassment and assault by two officers from Essex Police on Brian’s 75yr-old female neighbour. The Police had called on her, but she told them to go away. Instead, they pushed past her and unlawfully trespassed on her property. She was reduced to tears.

This is not the first time Essex Police have done this, either.

So, the two men went to Southend Police Station to report these crimes against an innocent, law-abiding neighbour. They were prepared to make statements, jointly and severally.

After a 20-minute wait, they were ushered into a room off the main foyer. As they stepped inside the room, believing they were going to make a statement, the door was locked behind them.

A police officer said he was going to arrest Brian for failing to notify the Police of his address on 11 January 2013. Michael Bird said, “You can’t arrest him. He is innocent of the crime you allege. I am prepared to make a statement to that effect. You must let him go.”

As a registered sex offender (he isn’t but they love to claim he is as they play their game of Disinformation), he is obliged to inform his local police station of his whereabouts.

On two occasions in January both Michael and Brian went to Southend Police Station and Brian provided his details. As he always does, he got a time and date-stamped receipt for his visit.

On 10 January 2013, they sent a letter (and a copy of their book to Mr Jim Barker-McCardle, the Chief Constable of Essex. The letter had Brian’s address on it … so the Police DID have his address within the required date. And not just any old police, but the Chief Constable, no less!)

Acting Police Sergeant Harper insisted on arresting Brian (at 20:35). Mr Pead told APS Harper that he had no right to arrest him, that he had no genuine belief that Brian had committed a crime and that he must under no circumstances touch him. He also told him that he did not consent to being policed. In fairness to APS Harper, he did not lay a finger on Brian, nor even attempt such a manoeuvre.

Michael Bird repeated his statement that Brian could not be guilty because he had been with Brian on both occasions when he had provided his address and bank account details to the police.

This is what APS Harper said: “But the computer says you have committed a crime, so I must arrest you.”

It’s official – policing by computer!

Brian asked for the reasons for his arrest: “…To prevent any investigation being hindered by Essex Police not being able to locate you. Also to allow the prompt and efficient investigation to allow us to obtain evidence by questioning…”

If that were true, then all they had to do was speak to Michael Bird who was prepared to make a statement proving Brian’s innocence on the spot.

So, off they led Brian to the Custody Suite and Michael Bird went home to start calling supporters of Brian, of free speech and of justice.

Brian was duly processed. In the Custody Suite, which is monitored with CCTV and audio, Brian informed the officers that:

(i) he is not a sex offender and the legislation proves it (he referred them to Archbold)
(ii) that he is actually exposing such activity in the book co-authored with the very same Michael Bird who attended the police station with Brian
(iii) that his book has been banned
(iv) that he has videos on Youtube explaining his predicament
(v) that they might like to visit lambethchildabuseandcoverup.com and make some genuine arrests of genuine sex offenders.

They appeared not to be listening, so, for the benefit of the tape recordings, he repeated his statements.

Duly processed, they removed him to Cell 17. He asked for his reading glasses, but wasn’t allowed them.

Under PACE regulations he asked for a paper and pencil, but he wasn’t allowed them.

He asked for a solicitor, but only knew of one in Southend (Jerman, Samuels and Pearson Solicitors, known locally as JSPS). Here is a link to the Directors of this company.

Whilst waiting for the solicitor, Brian then met with the Medical Officer. This was a new departure and had not occurred when he was processed on 1 February 2012 for a similar alleged offence.

The paramedic, name of Steve, was about Brian’s age. He was a decent enough chap. He asked Brian to sign a consent form for his medical records. Brian was not going to sign anything without reading it first and he had no glasses.

The glasses were obtained. Brian read the form and was not happy with it. He said he would only sign it if he added his own comments. He added: “I do not consent to this process or this form” and signed the form (so that they could not say he was not co-operating).

Then, Steve turned over the tri-fold document and revealed that on the front cover it read “The solicitor has told us that there are underlying mental health issues”.

Brian had not seen this front page when signing it.

You can probably see where they were hoping to go with that little trick, but Brian had already stated that he did not consent to the Form.

Brian does not have “underlying mental issues” – though the authorities will always try this with an ‘enemy’. It’s an easy option for them. Pay a couple of doctors to pronounce that a person needs to be Sectioned and before long they’re in a secure unit. There is much about this on the Internet, especially on YouTube.

But Steve had turned out to be a decent chap. He put himself at some risk by showing Brian the first page. He had worked out that Brian was far from having mental health issues. The two men – in a very short space of time – had “sussed one another out” and understood one another on an elementary level.

At around 11pm, a Jane Werry arrived from JSPS in a hoody and tracksuit bottoms. Without a business card (“I forgot them”). Hmmm. Not a good start and highly unprofessional.

Here is her profile on the JSPS website.

It might be worth noting her credentials. Or lack of them in order to deal effectively with Brian's situation.

Brian is a highly experienced therapist. His first encounter with any new person provides him with a great deal of information. He believed that this was not a woman to be trusted. (This is not in any way defamatory - it is merely his opinion. Readers are free to arrive at their own conclusions based on the information provided.)

Brian informed her that he is not a sex offender. She didn’t listen.

He told her that he couldn’t possibly be guilty of the crime for which he been arrested earlier that day because he had provided the police with his details in any event and he had an alibi – co-author Michael Bird was with him when he attended the police station to inform them of his details and he was also with him on this night and was willing to make a statement to police to this effect.

She did not want to listen to this, either. Which is pretty strange.

“I’m paying you, actually,” said Brian, “so I would like you to take my instructions.”

“You’re not paying me,” she retorted, smugly, “the Government is. You’re on Legal Aid.”

She had obviously not heard that Brian has paid his taxes for almost 40 years and his National Insurance for the same period.

“Well, I am deeply concerned about your comments,” added Brian.

Brian studied her face. It was the face of a naughty child who had been caught out, but wasn’t sure, and so had to ask.

“What comments?”

“Where you informed the Police that I have underlying mental health issues. I don’t have any.”

“I never said that.”

“In that case, go and get the Desk Sergeant and I’ll ask him whether you told him that or whether he made it up himself.”

“I’m withdrawing from representing you. You’ll have to get another solicitor.”

“From your firm?”

“No, I represent my firm.”

[In that case, if you were my employee I’d dismiss you for such conduct in a police station, thought Brian.]

She could not scurry away fast enough. She has probably not met the likes of Brian Pead before. [He will be following that incident up with an official complaint in several quarters.]

Brian was led back to his cell.

The civilian officer in charge of the cells was a decent enough fellow. He asked Brian who he should call next.

Tooks Chambers, Farringdon Street. The chambers of Michael Mansfield. He has been sent a copy of the book from Hillsborough to Lambeth.”

So off the nice chap went to call Tooks Chambers.

“They say they have never heard of you. They told me to tell you to try elsewhere.”

“OK, try Pamela Brain of 1 Inner Temple Lane.”

Pamela Brain was a barrister who originally represented Brian at Woolwich Crown Court on a charge of Exposure (he was innocent.)

She then witnessed the Trial at Woolwich collapse because the three females alleging Exposure failed to turn up at Court. The Judge was told that the Police had forgotten to inform them. (Read more about that farce in the forthcoming book For Whom the Bell Tolled.)

The nice chap returned.

“They can’t help either. The problem you’re having is you’re giving me the names of barristers’ chambers, not solicitors.”

Brian knew this, of course, but he wanted this process recorded: that Tooks failed to assist and that One Inner Temple failed to assist.

“What options am I left with, my friend?”

“Well, I’ll just have to go to the Call Centre and see what turns up.”

“Fine,” said Brian, “let's do that.”

He knows that it is a lottery. The quality of Duty Solicitors varies widely.

The Desk Sergeant, Steve May, then arrived in Brian’s cell (uninvited) and said, “We have reviewed all of the paperwork and you’ll be out of here tonight. We have no intention of keeping you here tonight” which Brian took for “Police-speak” as “Hard luck son, you ain’t going nowhere tonight.”

The 6ft5½tall sergeant (Brian asked him) smiled, turned on his heels and went home, his shift over.

And so it turned out that Brian’s assessment of the situation had been correct.

Brian woke around 7am and asked for a shower and to clean his teeth.

About an hour later, his requests were granted. He was surprised at how fluffy the towels were!

Feeling alert and refreshed, he requested some reading materials, some paper and a pencil. His wishes were granted.
Two magazines about gadgets were given to him which is probably about the worst possible reading material to give him since Brian has no interest in gadgets, but nonetheless the Cells Officer had done his best.

Brian set about recording the events of the previous evening in great detail.

Then he ate two Cereal bars.

Then a Solicitor arrived, a young man from an Essex and Suffolk firm of solicitors called Taylor Haldane Barlex that Brian had not heard of before, or he would have remembered such unusual names (he has a thing for language).

The young man looked about 20 but was about 28-30. He was actually a decent chap and named Paul Markham, who looked nothing like he does in this photo.

After providing his full details, Brian informed him that he wished to make a “No Comment” interview because the police had been given sufficient information the previous night (by both Brian and Michael Bird) that proved Brian’s innocence.

Paul Markham suggested otherwise. Having heard all of the facts, Mr Markham suggested to Brian that he merely “…reiterate the facts to the officers in order to ‘advance your defence’. By all means refuse to answer any tangential questions. It seems there was no good reason for your arrest and detention…”

So an interview was arranged for Interview Room 1. This room has no table. The interviewing officers were PC Coombes (75378) and PC Wilson (74214).

Brian has been arrested every year since 2008. Sometimes twice on the same day!. He is used to all types of combinations of interviewing officers. The good cop-bad cop routine is old news to him.
But here he had good cop-good cop. This routine was new to him!

The interview commenced at 09:42. This was his late father’s birthday. Thus the entire arrest, incarceration and interview had spanned the birthdays of his late brother (Robert) and his late father (Frederick). This was, in a strange quirk of fate, rather appropriate, since it was his late brother's death on board a Lowestoft trawler in 1972 that led Brian to give up his day job at the time and find work as a trawlerman as a callow 19 year old in order to investigate (under cover) his brother's death.
And it was Brian's late father who repeatedly told Brian that “if you give 'em enough rope, they'll hang themselves.”

Both men played an important part in Brian's life for very different reasons, but they came to mind throughout his time in the police station.

The interview was textbook stuff.

The interview ended at 10:13.

The two officers had conducted themselves impeccably.

During the debrief, Paul Markham told his client: “It went well. There were no issues. I hope it goes nowhere. You gave a good account of yourself. Even if they did charge you, bail should not be an issue. Hopefully there will be No Further Action.”

And so back to the cells. To await the decision. The Police would consult with the CPS who would make a decision whether prosecuting Brian Pead would be in the public interest. (This is always the standard by which cases are judged … yet Brian had been on the wrong end of ridiculous decisions on too many occasions to take anything for granted.)

Then he was called for fingerprinting. He had informed the Desk Sergeant (Steve May – the gentle giant) the previous evening that he did give his consent to being finger-printed or to have his photograph taken or to have a DNA sample taken. (All of this is on the PNC in any event.)

It appears that the Police do not understand the phrase “I do not give my consent.” They appear to believe that this means you are refusing. It does not. It merely means that you do not consent to them taking your fingerprints etc. Since the option is being forced by 6 burly coppers to have your prints taken, Brian Pead chose instead to comply with their instructions, but still refused to give his consent.
The civilian taking his prints was a decent chap. He had joined the Police as a cadet, but so far had failed to be accepted as a police officer. But at least he had not given up. He was still chasing his
dream and Brian respected that.

Back to the cells after finger-printing.

Shortly afterwards, at around midday, Brian was released.

Desk Sergeant Price provided Brian Pead with a NOTIFICATION OF NO FURTHER ACTION sheet. The box which stated “There is insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction” was ticked.

It didn’t actually say that Brian was innocent. Michael Bird had not been required to make a statement.

Before he left the station, an officer spoke to Pead. “It’s clear from evidence that you are an innocent man and the victim of a miscarriage of justice, but you have to comply with the Court Order, even if it’s wrong.”

For reasons of confidentiality, Brian Pead will not reveal the name of that police officer, who did not have to say what he said. So he commanded Brian's respect – which is hard to earn in any event.
Officer Coombes asked Brian if he wanted to have a lift home. Although he lives a 5-minute walk from the police station, he asked for a lift.

Brian then had to go to the Front desk to provide his official details “on the correct form”. Brian had been arrested because he hadn’t provided Essex Police with his details on the correct form, even though the form is computer generated within the police station! So, short of going into the back office of the police station, it’s impossible to comply with such a request.

However, the form Brian Pead was given to sign contained several errors. It claimed that his offence was “Causing or Inciting a Girl Under 13 to Engadge in Sexual Activity” (their spelling mistake).
Brian has never done this. He has never been charged with this. He has never been on trial for this.

Then the form claimed he was convicted of this offence on 22 November 2011.

This date is incorrect in any event. He was never on Trial at that time.

The form stated that Brian was given a 3-month suspended sentence. This is also incorrect.

Brian signed the form “ I AM NOT A SEX OFFENDER. SOME DETAILS ON THIS FORM ARE WRONG.)

Brian informed the desk operative that details were wrong. He merely shrugged.

Brian was taken back to his home address by PC Coombes and PC Wilson, who drove. It turned out that PC Coombes has been an officer for 7 years and loved his job. PC Wilson had been an officer for 4 years and wasn’t quite as enthusiastic as his colleague.


Both officers were extremely civil and a credit to Essex Police.

However, not a single officer asked Brian (or Michael Bird) to complete their original reason for going to the police station – trespass, harassment and assault of a frail 75 year old neighbour.

© LambethChildAbuseAndCoverUp.com 2013 All Rights Reserved